TITLE APOLLO OXYGEN TANK STRATIFICATION ANALYSIS- apollo 13 oxygen tank 2 5 ,2. NASA-MSC Contract No. NAS9-11576, Apollo Oxygen Tank Analysis, dated November 2,1970. 3. Study Program Plan, Apollo Oxygen Tank Stratification Analysis, The Boeing Company, February 26, 1971, memo 5-2510-HOU-4-201. 4. Task Summary, Apollo 14 Oxygen Tank Tests (DTO) Predictions, The Boeing Company, January 29, 1971, memo 5-2940-HOU-1249. 5.Apollo 13 | The Planetary SocietyApollo 13 was the 3rd attempt to land humans on the Moon and the 1st to fail. Fifty-six hours into the mission, when the crew was more than 320,000 kilometers (200,000 miles) from Earth, an explosion within the Apollo Service Module's oxygen tank disabled the primary spacecraft, forcing the crew to take shelter in the attached Lunar Module.



Moonport, Ch22-6

Oxygen tank 2 - the one that first ruptured - had undergone acceptance tests at the Beech Aircraft Corporation factory in 1967. The tank was installed in SM-106 (Apollo 10) and later removed for modifications. During the operation, the oxygen shelf was jarred and fell some 5 …

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

The Apollo 13 mission, planned as a lunar landing in the Fra Mauro area, was aborted because of an abrupt loss of service module cryogenic oxygen associated with a fire in one of the two tanks at approximately 56 hours. The lunar module provided the necessary support to sustain a minimum operational. condition for a safe return to earth.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 | Mission, History, & Facts | Britannica

Apollo 13, U.S. spaceflight, launched on April 11, 1970, that suffered an oxygen tank explosion en route to the Moon, threatening the lives of three astronauts—commander Jim Lovell, lunar module pilot Fred Haise, and command module pilot …

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Module, rupturing the other oxygen tank and blowing out ...

2 Houston, we have a problem The Apollo 13 mission launched at 2:13 p.m. EST, April 11, 1970 from launch complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center. It was to be the third mission to land on the Moon. An explosion in one of the oxygen tanks crippled the spacecraft forcing the crew to swing around the Moon and return to the Earth without landing.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 - Space Center Houston

APOLLO 13 A SUCCESSFUL FAILURE. Apollo 13 was to be the third lunar landing, but the mission was aborted after the Service Module ruptured due to a malfunction in an oxygen tank. Still, Apollo 13 is considered a "successful failure" because of the experience gained in rescuing the crew. Presented by

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

The Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Mission Documents

Apollo 13, Panel 1, Spacecraft Incident Investigation, Volume 2, Manufacturing and Test History of Oxygen Tank - 1970-07. PDF File (27.6 MB) Apollo 13, Panel 1, Spacecraft Incident Investigation, Volume 3, Special Analyses and Tests in Support of Investigation - 1970-09.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

50 Years Ago: “Houston, We’ve Had a Problem” | NASA

Apr 13, 2020·Haise noted that the quantity sensor for oxygen tank 2, which had failed earlier in the mission by showing off-scale high and located in the same tank that had experienced anomalies during the Countdown Demonstration Test back in March, was now oscillating between 20% and 60%, perhaps rocked back to life by the jolt. The crew suddenly faced a ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 launches to the moon - HISTORY

Feb 09, 2010·After an oxygen tank exploded on the evening of April 13, however, the new mission objective became to get the Apollo 13 crew home alive. LISTEN TO HISTORY THIS WEEK PODCAST: 'Houston, We've Had a ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

oxygen - What does "stirring tanks" mean? - Space ...

Oct 08, 2019·At 46:40:02 Mission Elapsed Time during the Apollo 13 mission, both oxygen tank fans were powered on, hopefully to get a more accurate reading of the tank pressure. In fact, the pressure is not influenced by fan operation. The reading of the capacitance tank gauge depends on a uniform temperature of tank contents.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

In Depth | Apollo 13 – NASA Solar System Exploration

Apr 09, 2019·Fast Facts: Apollo 13. Apollo 13's mission was to explore the hilly upland Fra Mauro region of the Moon. This was not to be. When an oxygen tank aboard the service module exploded, it ended hopes of a lunar landing.. However, the astronauts flew to the Moon and returned to Earth without loss of life, thanks in part to the competence of the crew and the …

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 - Encyclopedia Astronautica

Apollo 13 lifted off on schedule at 2:13 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on April 11, and for two days operations were routine; Capcom remarked at one point that flight controllers were bored to tears. A few hours later, however, an oxygen tank in the service module ruptured, depriving the spacecraft of most of its electrical power and oxygen, and ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

The Apollo 13 mission, planned as a lunar landing in the Fra Mauro area, was aborted because of an abrupt loss of service module cryogenic oxygen associated with a fire in one of the two tanks at approximately 56 hours. The lunar module provided the necessary support to sustain a minimum operational. condition for a safe return to earth.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Module, rupturing the other oxygen tank and blowing out ...

2 Houston, we have a problem The Apollo 13 mission launched at 2:13 p.m. EST, April 11, 1970 from launch complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center. It was to be the third mission to land on the Moon. An explosion in one of the oxygen tanks crippled the spacecraft forcing the crew to swing around the Moon and return to the Earth without landing.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

How Quickly Did the Crew of Apollo 13 Know They Had Lost ...

Apr 15, 2016·So when oxygen tank 2 ruptured on Apollo 13, the crew proceeded with mission rules. Readouts in the spacecraft and in Houston said the oxygen tank and fuel cells 1 and 3 had failed. Thinking that ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

What Happened to Apollo 13? - ThoughtCo

Feb 15, 2019·The Apollo 13 explosion was a result of faulty electrical wiring, which lowered the crew's supply of oxygen. The crew devised a workaround for their oxygen supply based on instructions from mission controllers, who had an inventory of materials onboard the ship that could be used for the fix.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 - Wikipedia

Apr 13, 2015·Sectors 2, 3, 5 and 6 held the main fuel tanks. Sector 4 held the damaged oxygen tank. At about 56 hours into the flight of Apollo 13, Jack Swigert was instructed to "stir the tanks," or agitate ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

The Manuals that Saved Apollo 13

from the moon, oxygen tank 2 on Apollo 13 exploded, forcing the crew to retreat from the command and services module Odyssey, to the relative safety of the docked lunar module Aquarius. The world watched and listened as astronauts Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert and Fred Haise executed frantic

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

In Depth | Apollo 13 – NASA Solar System Exploration

Apr 09, 2019·Fast Facts: Apollo 13. Apollo 13's mission was to explore the hilly upland Fra Mauro region of the Moon. This was not to be. When an oxygen tank aboard the service module exploded, it ended hopes of a lunar landing.. However, the astronauts flew to the Moon and returned to Earth without loss of life, thanks in part to the competence of the crew and the …

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13: Service module oxygen tank details ...

Mar 25, 2014·Apollo 13's Oxygen Tank No. 2 (S/No. 10024X-TA0008) which exploded was originally assigned to Apollo 10. moorouge Member . Posts: 2458 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009: posted 03-19-2014 02:19 PM My understanding to the '13' problem apart from the change in voltage was that the tank was dropped during its removal from the '10' SM. This shook ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Case Study: Apollo 13 - Cause Mapping

On April 13, 1970, 56 hours into a mission to land on the moon, the astronauts aboard the Apollo 13 spacecraft heard a loud bang. Indications on oxygen tank 2 immediately went to zero quantity and the astronauts reported seeing “a gas of some sort” vent into space as the level in oxygen tank 1, the only other oxygen tank in the Service ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

How Quickly Did the Crew of Apollo 13 Know They Had Lost ...

Apr 15, 2016·So when oxygen tank 2 ruptured on Apollo 13, the crew proceeded with mission rules. Readouts in the spacecraft and in Houston said the oxygen tank and fuel cells 1 and 3 had failed. Thinking that ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Service Module Damage: A ...

Mar 06, 2020·The 1970 analysis concludes that minor colour changes indicate some hard surfaces of oxygen tank 2 remain - although Apollo 13 Review Board (5-8 Point 4) seems to contradict this. The transcripts of the moment the crew gained sight of the damaged SM after separation provide additional context to the images above (redacted):

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

Apollo 13 - Academic Kids

Jun 18, 2005·Apollo's liquid oxygen tank was a marvel of engineering, able to hold several hundred pounds of highly pressurized liquid gas to supply the craft with oxygen, fuel for electricity (along with hydrogen) and water from the by-product of the fuel cells. Left alone, the tank was capable of safely holding liquid oxygen under high pressure for years ...

Contact SupplierWhatsApp

FREE Apollo 13 Essay - ExampleEssays

The Apollo 13 malfunction was caused by an explosion and rupture of oxygen tank number 2. All oxygen stores were lost within about three hours, along with loss of water, electrical power, and use of the propulsion system. The crew's safety has been compromised when NASA did not address the problem seen in oxygen tank number 2 prior to launch.

Contact SupplierWhatsApp